Archive for the ‘Overheard’ Category

Governor’s Island, Anthony McCall

Sunday, September 20th, 2009

A beautiful projection installation in the chapel on Governor’s Island, by Anthony McCall.

McCall

McCall

Sketches and Mockups

Monday, September 14th, 2009

When Wendy and I met, I showed her the sketches and described my desire to better understand how we should animate the typography.  She had already been doing some sketching of her own in Keynote, so we compromised.  We started off projecting some of her slides onto walls.

Then, I quickly built some “gallery walls” using foamboard and we tried bunch of other experiments.  Stay tuned for the results.

visual cacophony

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

Gallery with type

gallery sketches

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

2_gallery_with_type

Michael’s 3D sketches

Lighting Possibilities Retry

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

I re-encoded the original video using QuickTime Pro…

Output as QuickTime Movie (could have also tried “export  for web”)

Video settings
Compression: H.264
Quality: High
Key frame rate: 24
Bitrate: 720 kbits/sec (optimized for streaming)
Frame reordering: yes
Encoding mode: multi-pass
Dimensions: 640×480

Audio settings
Format: AAC
Sample rate: 48.000kHz
Channels: Stereo (L R)
Bit rate: 128 kbps

Optimize for fast start

outside the blog

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009

For the record:
In addition to our blog, we have ongoing emails. The initial email might be about scheduling a meeting, and then grow to include questions and research about, well, anything. Here’s an example, after I told Michael I wanted to meet in the city so I could buy a projector, maybe at B&H.

Wendy,
Here’s about an hours worth of searching.  I stumbled onto pico pocket projectors.  Let me know if you want me to back out to “normal” projectors and see about low cost.  My view is that the small projectors could be a good prototyping tool for you in the same way that the photo frames and the XActi camera are.  You may even be able to connect your XActi to one of these.
Michael

(The email had an attached  PDF)

Lists (a start)

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009

Interactions:

  • Cranking
  • Sitting or standing (eg a switch, or weight)
  • Proximity
  • Motion detection
  • Pulling/pushing
  • Running (e.g. treadmill)
  • Color detection
  • Sound (e.g. of you clap, it turns something on)
  • Opening/closing (e.g. door, window, drawer)
  • Positional sensing
  • Hitting keys
  • etc…

Static Type:

  • Spray paint
  • Silk screen
  • etching
  • Letterpress
  • Stencil
  • Cut out
  • Scratch
  • Burn
  • Scribble
  • Sandblast
  • Woodblock
  • Magic marker
  • Pencil
  • Typewriter
  • Sewn/needlepoint
  • Neon
  • LED
  • etc…

Materials:

  • clay
  • Wood
  • Cardboard
  • Plastic
  • Styrofoam
  • Cloth
  • Paper
  • Glass
  • Metal
  • Rubber
  • Screen
  • Leather
  • Carpet
  • Grass
  • Sand
  • Food
  • Concrete
  • etc…

Typographic manipulations:

  • Letter spacing
  • Line spacing
  • Bigger/smaller
  • Fonts (reg, bold, italic, black, condensed, etc)
  • Color
  • Focus—in/out
  • Rotate
  • Distort
  • etc…

Sound Inspirations

Thursday, August 20th, 2009
Act I – The HighLine IMG_1987 My father and sister came to visit this week and we spent a bit of time out and about in New York City.  One of the places we visited was the HighLine – a recently opened park utilizing elevated space along the west side of Manhattan that was formerly a railway freight line.  As we walked through one of the more “designed” areas of the park (pictured above) which passes through a building, I heard something which got me thinking about acoustics in a space.  At certain spots in the space, I could hear  music playing and in others, I simply heard the background.  There were also spots where I could hear conversations around me more clearly.  This got me thinking about the role of “obstructions” and surfaces in the context of this installation work. This idea seems to resonate somewhat with Wendy’s last post about focusing sound. What if the space had features which reflected the sound so it could be focused in different ways? Act II – Moveable Type I also revisited the “Moveable Type” installation at The New York Times building on 42nd St and found myself much more focused on the sound of this installation.  In addition to the ambient sound design that accompanies the transitions between the scenes in the work, it seems to me that each of the 560 vacuum-fluorescent display modules also contains a speaker.  This has the effect of providing localization to some of the specific transition sounds.  I have a hard time imagining the installation without these sounds.  While they are almost akin to “sound effects”, they seem to me to add impact to the visual transitions in a way that just feels right.  The little clicks and zaps add dimension and context (perhaps through subtle sonic editorializing) to the information that is displayed.  Without these sounds, the quantity of text is overwhelming. I’m also thinking about the connection  between the movement of the text and the way the sound reinforces the visual effect of that movement.  They’re bound tightly together. Act III – Fashioning Felt IMG_2043 The Cooper-Hewitt Museum’s Fashioning Felt exhibition gave me an opposite experience from the one I had while walking through the HighLine.  Several of the works in the exhibition were acoustical panels made from industrial felt.  I wasn’t aware of felt’s sound absorbing properties.  Seeing (and hearing) how much the Diller Scofidio + Renfro designed conference room wall divider (a sandwich of clear polycarbonate between two patterened sheets of waterjet cut industrial felt) absorbed sound make me think of how this sort of material could be used to control the acoustic space of our installation.

ear focus

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

Has the following ever happened to you? You are in a room full of people. Every one is talking and it is a big jumble. Then someone, somewhere in the room, says something of interest to you—like the name of the movie you saw last night, or the town you grew up in – or better yet, YOUR name–  and all of a sudden, that person’s voice becomes more clear, more prominent. It is as though your ear is a camera with a zoom lens, and you have just zoomed in and focused.

cacophony test

Saturday, August 15th, 2009
Michael’s test using binaural microphones. Big difference between listening through a speaker and  wearing headphones. Well, that’s the point!

working

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

lap topsM&W working

Laptops are the main tool for now.

M&W at DeBaun

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009
Michael and Wendy — experiments from November 2008 at DeBaun
This video was originally shared on blip.tv by Wendy Richmond with a No license (All rights reserved) license.

lighting possibilities

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

Meditation on Spatial Relations Between Conversations

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

space ideas 7

A sketch of a complex interaction in the gallery space using rope&pulley interfaces.  A collection of ropes connect satellite “private” spaces to a single “public” space.  Participants in the “public space” manipulate ropes connected to the “private” spaces and engage in a dialog, which consists of projected words of a conversation in both spaces.  I was imagining in this sketch that a participant in the “public” space could engage in a “tug of war” with another participant in remote “private” space (and perhaps there would be partitions to further reinforce the idea of “private”).  More conversations are projected on the floor in the “public” space as more participiants pull on the ropes.

Other thoughts:

  • Projecting on the floor may cause some interesting effects as the light is broken up by the pulleys and the people.
  • It could also be interesting to cover the pulleys with screens so new participants in the galley don’t immediately see what is happening.
  • Are pulleys an appropriate interface for this?  Are we limiting our possibilities by considering this interface instead of other interfaces?
  • Should participants in both “public” and “private” locations be able to see what is being “said” in both locations?
  • Projections could fade away after interaction stops.
  • More activity (rope movement) brings a conversation “forward” (meaning on top) in the public space.

blip.tv-hosted video

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

blip.tv has good licensing provisions (the full complement of CC licenses) and also the ability to turn off advertisements. I was also trying to setup a custom player, but so far it seems that I can only do that for “episode”-based uploads.

This video was originally shared on blip.tv by mchladil with a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license.

Vimeo-hosted Video

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

Youtube-hosted Video

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

Flickr-hosted Video

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

This is a test of uploading a video to flickr for hosting.  Unfortunately, Flickr only allows two video uploads per month in a free accout.

Posting Videos in Blogs

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

I’ve been trying to find a “workflow” that will make it easy for Wendy to post videos into her blog.  There are a couple of considerations:

  • Wendy prefers to keep the videos private right now (avoiding video services such as Youtube, Viddler, Vimeo, Blip.tv).
  • The posting process should be easy as adding an image to a post (or a youtube video) — hand-editing “embed code” snippets is probably not going to make the cut.

So far, these considerations mean that she will probably need to host the video files on her site.  In the past few days as I’ve been researching how to do this, I was focusing more on the Wordpress side of the problem: finding an integrated workflow that makes the posting process easier.  This research has turned up a few Wordpress plugins:

  • Stream Video Player looks promising — and the interface for adding the video is typing a special tag that Wordpress recognizes when the plugin is installed.  The backend of this process (encoding the videos) will be a bit complex, though.
  • Wordpress also has its own built-in video player, but again, it doesn’t handle the encoding portion of the process.

This morning, I took a slightly different approach to figuring out how to solve the video posting problem we’re having.  I searched for “host your own video”.  Michael Martine’s post on whether to host your own videos offers a concise summary of the considerations.  My inclination would be to go for a video hosting service (perhaps Flickr… which seems to allows the content owner a good degree of control over the reuse of uploaded content) to keep things simple.

I think that part of the “meta” conversation of this aspect of documenting our work is Wendy’s exploration of public/privacy.  We’re also putting out “private” conversation (or somewhat edited versions of private conversation here), but at the same time want to control how it’s used.

    Spots on tables

    Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

    Spot lights shining on tables, illuminating the text. (text will be the halves of cell phone conversations. BTW last night when I told DK the idea for title “Half the Conversation” said, “Half the Story.” ) Anyway, maybe the text should not sandblasted on glass. Maybe we want more modest materials. Maybe all cardboard. Choices of materials will be very important.

    spots on table small